Re: [ga] Motion asking for GA poll on rebid of ICANN contract
This is a perfect example of when lack of process leads to dictatorship.
First: Mr. Love is a member and has no requirement to care what TR thinks.
Second: TR is a duly elected chair and has all the requirement to care what
Mr. Love thinks. But he openly states that he does not care what members
Third: in that there is no procedure, votes and motions only occur when one
man wants them to occur. TR
fourth: Apathy in the early stages.
Combine 1,2,3 and 4 above and you have dictatorship.
(it is kind of cool to actually watch how dictators come to power, I have
never been a part of such a process)
Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2002-05-02 17:54:06 -0400, James Love wrote:
> >It will give the GA members a voice. I don't care what your
> >personal views are on the merits of the proposal I would like
> >voted on.
> Likewise, I don't care what your personal views are on what the GA
> should vote on.
> That said, could we please return to dialogue mode, and try to get a
> motion onto the table which would enable the GA to make a
> _constructive_ contribution? If you want help and suggestions for
> this, please refer to my original reply to your motion. If you
> don't want that help, that's your problem.
> Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html