Re: [ga] Auerbach vs. ICANN update
> With regard to "bias"? That exactly does this mean? I have
> opinions. So do you. The ICANN brief says they shouldn't have to give
> the records because he rocks the boat, even noting how many times he
> vote in the majority as a reason for not giving him access to the records.
> Does this strike you as OK? And the gall of ICANN lawyers to quesiton
> Karl's mandate on the basis of the votes...... What was that about? This
> is an organization who can't explain to anyone how the board is picked.
an interesting interpretation of the icann response Jamie... i am sorry but
i dont happen to agree at all with your "read" here..
> Why doesn't the
> ICANN board tell Karl they can settle this informally, and fix the
> Why do we need lawyers for this?
you might pose the same question to Karl......
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html