Re: [ga] Independent Review Panel?
At 00:49 11/04/02 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>It is well-known by now that, in the Lynn proposal, an independent
>review panel is characterized as a "waste."
>What do you folks think about this?
The original proposals for an Independent Review Panel are good and they
are a necessary component of ICANN's structure as originally envisaged.
That they have not been implemented is a crying shame.
With due respect, Thomas, I think it is misguided to now start casting
about for watered-down alternatives.
The only idea that I like is that of an industry Ombudsman, but this office
could be separate from ICANN altogether and should not be used for review
of Board decisions.
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html