DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Independent Review Panel?

At 00:49 11/04/02 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>It is well-known by now that, in the Lynn proposal, an independent
>review panel is characterized as a "waste."
>What do you folks think about this?

The original proposals for an Independent Review Panel are good and they 
are a necessary component of  ICANN's structure as originally envisaged.
That they have not been implemented is a crying shame.

With due respect, Thomas, I think it is misguided to now start casting 
about  for watered-down alternatives.

The only idea that I like is that of an industry Ombudsman, but this office 
could be separate from ICANN altogether and should not be used for review 
of Board decisions.


This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>