Re: [ga] Icannatlarge.com - conflict of interest
Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2002-02-28 15:49:15 -0800, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
> >I would go a bit further and stipulate that "no present or past
> >officers, or committee appointees, of the DNSO or ICANN shall be
> >eligible to stand for office in the At Large." If what is sought
> >is bottom-up legitimacy, then the top is not where we start
> >looking for officials of the AtLarge IMHO.
> So if the at large is successful and sends people to the board,
> those should afterwards resign from the effort? Doesn't sound too
> reasonable to me.
Not quite Thomas. You're missing the point. The key
words are "stand for office" which does not in any way
preclude achieving office via the AtLarge. Big
Hermes Network Inc.
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html