Re: [ga] gtld Statement on NC Election (Please Post)
I also agree. This is akin to bid rigging, jury tampering, etc. It
is not the proper way to handle things, IMHO.
Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 12:07:59 PM, DPF <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
D> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:13:33 -0600, "Neuman, Jeff"
D> <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> wrote:
>>We urge the NC to reject the motion and hold an immediate election for its
>>chair in accordance with the Rules of Procedure that are currently in
>>effect. If it turns out that this motion is desirable by the Internet
>>community, the motion can be voted on at some point in the future (after
>>enough time for feedback from the ICANN community) and apply to subsequent
D> I agree. Terms of office and term limits should not be changed in
D> such a way which affect an incumbent.
D> ICQ 29964527
D> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
D> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
D> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
D> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55 (972) 788-2364 Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html