DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] concerning seperate "reseller" group

Saturday, Saturday, January 19, 2002, 2:25:29 PM, Abel Wisman wrote:

> If the GA showed more signs of structurised constituency we might even become 
> a real constituency with our own council and prepresentation, perhaps that is 
> the goal we would like to work towards.

The GA is the assembly of all the recognized constituencies (who get
to elect members to the Names Council, which in turn elect board
members) and those who are not in any constituency.

The GA can't become a constituency, so to get an equal voice in the
system, one must either fit into an existing constituency, or seek to
form a new one where appropriate.

I think that a registration service providers constituency could
easily generate enough interest to gain several hundred active
members. As a group, I think we could easily organize.

More details to follow, as well as answers to Ross's excellent points,
after the weekend.

Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>

"There is no better way to exercise the imagination than the study of
the law. No artist ever interpreted nature as freely as a lawyer
interprets the truth."
-- Jean Giradoux

This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>