DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] For those interested in delete games


On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, William X Walsh wrote:

> There is no need for additional proposals, Verisign should resolve the
> technical problems they may be having, and the current system should
> stand unless and until there is a REAL need for changing it.

ok, thanks for the comment.

> Verisign should be required to substantiate the NEED For a change in
> the current system, and pointing out PRECISELY what problems exist in
> the current system that warrant a change in the way this process
> works, and then a process should be developed and approved of that
> resolve the problems.

they have; at least to registrars.

> Verisign is instead trying to use the existence of a fictional problem
> to justify creating a new program that will make up for the tremendous
> loss of market share that their Registrar has experienced in the last
> 2 years and create a completely new profit center for them.

the problem is not fictional. bareing this in mind would you now like to
submit some requirements?



This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>