ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Objective of a GA member



I think there is one question that was not asked that should have been,

  11. Is the GA doing its job?

IMNSHO, the GA could do great things, no matter what anyone else says. I
see nothing but bickering from the GA; I hope the GA will stand and
the interested will provide input into the process, no matter how broken
ICANN is, when large groups of folks AGREE people listen; when a few loud
mouths post alot of krap people just tune out and discount the entire GA.

If you have ideas you want to see executed, collect the masses, write the
documents; if you want to continue to disservice the GA post more krap.

-rick


On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Eric Dierker wrote:

> Self serving I know to answer my own questions but otherwise cowardly,
> please everyone answer so we can establish some values.
>
> Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > 1.    Why are you monitoring?
> >
>
> I find it intriguing and enlightening.  Even when kicked off the list I
> monitored and engaged off list.  I believe this is my children's' future
> and my fathers present.
>
> >
> > 2.    Why do you participate?
> >
>
> Because I may not be the sharpest tool in the shed but we have a place
> also.  Man even my voice may impact some great person to do something
> different.  And by the criticism I receive I learn
>
> >
> > 3.    What do you expect of the GA?
> >
>
> Be the guiding, (not governmental, not dictatorial, not ruling or
> deciding) voice of common users of the Internet.
>
> >
> > 4.    Name your four favorite GA participants.
> >
>
> This is hard because I like so many and will forget a few.
> Baptista-yes, Corliss, Berryhill, Kristy, Joanna, Namecritic, Joseph,
> certainly Sotiris, Brett and Michael are in a group by themselves,
> Flemming and Roberto.
>
> >
> > 5.    Name your least favorite GA participants.
> >
>
> Me, I post to much and don't get along with technocrats.
>
> >
> > 6.    Are you in favor of the ALSC proposal?
> >
>
> Humans versus DMNHs and 6 versus 9 should not be issues but I want to
> move forward.
>
> >
> > 7.    Do you want an IDNH So?
> >
>
> Yesterday and last year are toooooo late.
>
> >
> > 8.     Is staff doing a proper job?
> >
>
> They have had an opportunity to do it right but refuse.  I know it is a
> hard job but man they do it in a self interested way.  They get paid
> enough to serve us so I think they should.
>
> >
> > 9.    Is the BoD doing a proper job?
> >
>
> I have been around this tree with Karl - what is their job?
>
> >
> > 10.    Is the NC doing a proper job?
> >
>
> No absolutely not.  No excuses, they are most responsible for blocking
> the GA and bottoms up open and transparent consensus.  Can we recall
> them?
>
> >
> > Eric
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>