ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Objective of a GA member


Eric and all assembly members,

  Ok.  However I find some of the questions both leading and
questionably couched.  So I shall answer accordingly.

  See answers below..

Eric Dierker wrote:

> Self serving I know to answer my own questions but otherwise cowardly,
> please everyone answer so we can establish some values.
>
> Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > 1.    Why are you monitoring?

  I am not monitoring I am participating.

>
> >
>
> I find it intriguing and enlightening.  Even when kicked off the list I
> monitored and engaged off list.  I believe this is my children's' future
> and my fathers present.
>
> >
> > 2.    Why do you participate?

  Because I am a stakeeholder.

>
> >
>
> Because I may not be the sharpest tool in the shed but we have a place
> also.  Man even my voice may impact some great person to do something
> different.  And by the criticism I receive I learn
>
> >
> > 3.    What do you expect of the GA?

  I expect nothing.  I hope for allot.

>
> >
>
> Be the guiding, (not governmental, not dictatorial, not ruling or
> deciding) voice of common users of the Internet.
>
> >
> > 4.    Name your four favorite GA participants.

  I have no favorites.  To do so I think would be contrary to open
participation.  Rather I am more interested in issues that concern
the purpose of the DNSO GA.

>
> >
>
> This is hard because I like so many and will forget a few.
> Baptista-yes, Corliss, Berryhill, Kristy, Joanna, Namecritic, Joseph,
> certainly Sotiris, Brett and Michael are in a group by themselves,
> Flemming and Roberto.
>
> >
> > 5.    Name your least favorite GA participants.

  Again, I have none.  I think such a question is leading and divisive.

>
> >
>
> Me, I post to much and don't get along with technocrats.
>
> >
> > 6.    Are you in favor of the ALSC proposal?

  No

>
> >
>
> Humans versus DMNHs and 6 versus 9 should not be issues but I want to
> move forward.
>
> >
> > 7.    Do you want an IDNH So?

  As an SO, no.

>
> >
>
> Yesterday and last year are toooooo late.
>
> >
> > 8.     Is staff doing a proper job?

  Which or whoms staff?

>
> >
>
> They have had an opportunity to do it right but refuse.  I know it is a
> hard job but man they do it in a self interested way.  They get paid
> enough to serve us so I think they should.
>
> >
> > 9.    Is the BoD doing a proper job?

  No.

>
> >
>
> I have been around this tree with Karl - what is their job?
>
> >
> > 10.    Is the NC doing a proper job?

  No

>
> >
>
> No absolutely not.  No excuses, they are most responsible for blocking
> the GA and bottoms up open and transparent consensus.  Can we recall
> them?
>
> >
> > Eric
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>