Re: [ga] BC exclusionary practices and GA funding

[Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

on 10/18/01 5:39 PM, William X Walsh at william@userfriendly.com wrote:

> Thursday, Thursday, October 18, 2001, 6:54:41 AM, Joanna Lane wrote:
> 
>> Excellent work Roeland! It seems you have captured the GA consensus position
>> in wording that would be perfect for a Motion or Motions by the GA on these
> 
> Consensus, Joanna?
> 
> I think not.
> 
> Perhaps you are suffering from some wishful thinking.  I have not seen
> anything resembling a consensus on this issue yet.


You are correct. In mitigation, I would say that at this stage of the game,
wishful thinking is a result, but I still think these are pressing issues
that should be addressed by the NC. Can we agree on that at least?

Regards,
Joanna

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html