[ga] Best Practices/ who objects? I do !!

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

Hi William, Eric and All

Despite repeated requests, and a strong vote to the same effect, I note that
people are still discussing list rules, best practices and all sorts of
procedural issues on the [ga] list.

They are also clogging up the [ga-abuse] list with discussion about
complaints procedures.

Could you please take all of that stuff to [ga-rules].

Meanwhile I would ask the list monitors to expedite the current swag of
complaints.

Thank you all for your courtesy.

Best regards
Patrick Corliss


----- Original Message -----
From: William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
To: Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>
Cc: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 3:31 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [ga] Best Practices/ who objects?


> Saturday, Saturday, August 25, 2001, 9:06:36 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > Mr. Walsh,
>
> > Most of the time you expound legal principals which are erroneous at
best in that
> > you have no legal or legal scholarly training and jump to ridiculous
conclusions.
> > Now you jump to research conclusions which reveal a whole new level of
ignorance.
> > The research you do not know and I have forgotten could fill a library.
>
> > Show me one sentence in one place where one matter was voted upon that
demands
> > suspension.  Just one smart man.  If you can I shall self suspend for 48
hours.
> > You may want to callaborate with Mr Svensson.  the offer remains open
for 24
> > hours.  Do not promote vagueness for a taking of a right should be very
specific.
>
> No one has claimed that suspensions were mandatory, according to the
> VOTED ON RULES, they are at the discretion of the MODERATORS, subject
> to appeal to the Chair.
>
> No one has said otherwise.
>
> ----------------
> A list monitor may impose 2 sanctions against offenders:
>
> - Monitoring of posts. This will cause delay of postings from the affected
>   individual until a list moderator approves them as being within the
content
>   rules, or rejects them
> - Suspension of posting rights. This will cause mail from that person not
to be
>   sent to the GA list.
>
> Both sanctions are imposed for a limited period of time (typically 2
weeks),
> and are announced on the mailing list. Repeat offenders may get
correspondingly
> longer sentences (for instance 4 weeks for a second offense, 8 weeks for a
third).
> The period is decided by the list monitor.
> ------------------
>
> Why you got on this diatribe I do not know.
>
> I will say that I have lodged a complaint with the moderators about
> your message above.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html