Re: [ga] Re: Excess Posting Limits

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 07:08:26PM -0700, William S. Lovell wrote:
> > Sorry.  First of all, none of the above are real problems -- they are
> > all just whining about inconveniences.  Second, list software wouldn't
> > handle proxies, anyway.  If you want to send a message to a person, and
> > have them forward it for you, that works under any scenario.
> 
> Case in point: I would almost use up my limit for the day simply if I
> responded to Patrick Corliss and no one else.

Why on earth do you think that you would have to respond to every email by 
Patrick Corliss, or anyone else?

> So I gather you can be put down as one who would prefer the post
> limit rules to be circumvented by artifice, rather than by the
> establishment of some recognized procedure that would allow
> a full response by someone being deluged.  So be it.

No.  I would rather that the posting limits not be circumvented.  

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html