[ga] Re: Questions about the ccSO Proposal
Roberto writes: "I wonder whether the key is to separate the technical part
(almost identical to the "supplier") from the "general purpose" (almost
identical to the "consumer"). What I would consider worth exploring is a
"technical" DNSO (Registrars, Registries [gTLDs+ccTLDs], ISPs) and a new
"consumer" CSO (Business, TradeMark, Non-Com, Individuals, ...)."
I myself have heard identical propositions being put forth by Mike Roberts
and others in Stockholm. Although there is merit in the proposal, I do have
If such a restructuring results in the destruction of the At-Large, then
"individuals" or "end users" will only find recourse in representation via
the CSO. This could mean even less of a voice on the Board.
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html