ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Country code chiefs go nuclear on ICANN


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga-full@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga-full@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 6:52 AM

The ccTLDs came into ICANN very early, and have worked within the process --
making substantive and critical contributions.

------

Do the so-called "ccTLDs" meet the same contractural
and operational requirements as the other TLDs that
ICANN claims to promote (franchise?) ?

Did the ccTLDs pay a $50,000 application fee ?

Has each of the ccTLDs come before the ICANN Board and
made a case for why they should be considered to be part
of the so-called "ICANN root" ?

Do the ccTLDs operate with NEBs*-quality equipment ?

Are .TV, .AM and .FM ccTLDs ?


* NEBs - Network Equipment and Building Standards

Jim Fleming
http://www.DOT-NZ.com
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>