RE: [ga] Country code chiefs go nuclear on ICANN

["JIM FLEMING" <JimFleming@prodigy.net>]

Which of the following are so-called, "ccTLDs" ?

http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt

The consensus is to remove all non-performing TLDs
from the prime 2,048 IPv8 slots to allow the "best of breed" TLDs
to gain more exposure. IPv16 can accommodate 32,768 TLDs.
Any non-performing TLD can be moved away from the users who
are demanding other TLDs, such as .KIWI, .BULLS, and .BEATLES.


Jim Fleming
http://www.DOT-NZ.com
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga-full@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga-full@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 6:52 AM
To: 'Marc Schneiders'
Cc: GA
Subject: RE: [ga] Country code chiefs go nuclear on ICANN


The ccTLDs came into ICANN very early, and have worked within the process --
making substantive and critical contributions. From what I have seen, they
have held many meetings, organized across the ccTLDs, both regionally and in
conjunction with ICANN's meeting.

Their issues are broader and significantly different from the gTLDs, which
is the primary work so far of the DNSO.  They have a relationship directly
to their governments (respectively), which the gTLDs don't, etc, etc.

All in all, the idea of creating an SO seems appropriate to allow them to
work within themselves, remain a part of ICANN, and coordinate as
appropriate with other SOs.
Of course, we will take broad consultation within the BC as the concept is
developed.

Marilyn

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Schneiders [mailto:marc@venster.nl]
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 8:47 PM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Cc: GA
Subject: RE: [ga] Country code chiefs go nuclear on ICANN


On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, at 19:19 [=GMT-0400], Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:

> I think the headline is a mischaracterisation.  The ccTLD move has
received
> support from the BC, ISPC, IPC, in a briefing they held today. I expect
> supporting statements to be made in the public meeting. Everyone I've
talked
> to seems to agree that they are already doing so much work on the issues
> which are different from gTLD issues -- in essence almost operating as an
> SO.

A lot of work has been going on on the NCDNHC for years. Should they
get a couple of seats on the ICANN board too? No, the BC etc. will not
support that. What does this support mean???

Really, the ccTLds are part of the DNSO. By *definition*.

>
> Marilyn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce James [mailto:bmj@keyname.net]
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 1:30 PM
> To: GA
> Subject: [ga] Country code chiefs go nuclear on ICANN
>
>
> Country code chiefs go nuclear on ICANN:
>
>  http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/19395.html
>
> /Bruce
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html