RE: [ga] NCtelecon 9 May 2001, minutes

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear Erica,
I use Roeland's user readable version of your post (thank you Roeland).

On 09:26 29/05/01, Roeland Meyer said:
> > From: erica roberts [mailto:erica.roberts@bigpond.com]
> > Since my comment on the NC re the need to establish procedures for the 
> creation of email lists has been reported on this list (see below), I 
> want to make a point of clarification.

I suppose that the GA Members are entitled to access and discuss the NC 
meetings?
BTW I thank you to actively participate into our agape.

> > I have heard a lot of comment on this list about the time
> > it took to set up new email lists.
> > While is  true that, IF the tech person is given all the relevant
> > information relating to list rules and administration,  it is a
> > relatively quick and simple matter to create a new list.
> > However, a lot of time can be wasted if the relevant information
> > relating to list rules (if any) and admin is not provided and needs
> > to be collected.  Procedures are needed so that
> > people requiring the creation of new lists are aware of the
> > information they should provide to the tech responsible for
> > creating new lists and not put the onus on the Secretariat
> > or tech support to spend time chasing up the information.
>
>I thought that this process problem was solved some time ago. Nevertheless,
>it is a one-time expense and should not be factored into cost projections
>going forward.

Roeland remark is pertinent.

But we mostly feel here that - unless you did not share your
knowledge of ML management with Philip Sheppard and
the other Members - the NC position to save a few dimes in
closing GA-FULL only responds to an agenda extremelly
detrimental to the interests of the iCANN. The GA-FULL is the
only chanel left for the iCANN to keep an open active and an
mutually informative relation with the opponents to its positions.

The example of the coopetitive roots market knowledge by the
NC members is dismaying. However limited, artificial and
ill organized the DNSO - through the GA - has set-up an ML
ga-root where the matter may be learned and real the people
leading real operations can be discussed with. It is childish
purposedly no to refer to it. Grant Forsyth document's is not
comprehensive and is static (it does not take into consideration
most of the coming problems and from what I understand from
the NC report lead to an important technical error) but it is a
good start. I understand he discussed it on the ga-root, not
on the BC.

Jefsey

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html