RE: [ga] Motion - DNS Developer Constituency - Acknowledgement of r study
Patrick, I am not sure that my question would hold them to a higher
standard. That would remain to be seen, if they emerge with sufficient
organizations, people, and time to develop a constituency, develop bylaws,
identify funding, etc.
In essence, though, I think that asking such a question about any new
constituency is a reasonable thing to do.... and that is what I was doing.
From: Patrick Greenwell [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 5:00 PM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Cc: 'William S. Lovell'; Jefsey Morfin; email@example.com
Subject: RE: [ga] Motion - DNS Developer Constituency - Acknowledgement
fo r study
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
> Disagree. I am unclear on whether this community is a distinct community
> that is large enough to devote the time needed to create, and then sustain
> constituency. Perhaps it is, but there hasn't been any analysis which
> documents that, or the sustainability, including participating in a
> meaningful way in ICANN, bearing the cost of funding the DNSO... etc.
It is a bit inappropriate to hold this nascent effort to higher standards
than were placed upon those forming the original constituencies, don't you
Earth is a single point of failure.
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html