ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Reply to Danny


On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 17:51:58 -0700, Eric Dierker wrote:

It also is the reason for the constant attacks on due process, or
>should
>I say lack thereof.

This is very well but you lose credibility when you keep on and on
about something.  I mean this as constructive advice.

If I think something is wrong or process was unfair (like I did over
suspension of Mr Walsh) I will make my point, perhaps reply to a
couple of posts on it and then move on.

Likewise regarding the Verisign agreements.  I was aghast at the
process (as were the Names Council) but after the point had bene made
on this, I moved on to debating the substance of the agreements.

Yes process is important but we should make sure we do not tie
ourselves into knots over every thing we are unhappy with, at the cost
of blocking debate on other issues.

DPF
--
david@farrar.com
ICQ 29964527
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>