[ga] Re: WG direction.

["Roberto Gaetano" <ga_chair@hotmail.com>]

Roeland wrote:
>
>The answer to this is to define what a proper registry should be. That will
>raise the barrier to entry sufficiently that this objection should be
>satisfied. I also think that this should be the direction of the new WG,
>before we go anywhere else.

The current answer is that a proper Registry is what comes out from the 
ICANN accreditation.
We may all (well, almost all) agree that so far the process has not been hte 
best: rushed evaluation, decisions not always giving the impression of being 
well informed (I still laugh about the motivation on .air converted to 
.aero), and more.

Maybe a WG on criteria and process for future expansion would make sense!
But what you are proposing is a WG to throw away what has been done so far, 
and restart again (in the best traditions of Internet Governance: when one 
way or the other new TLDs are about to be added, opla', let's start all 
over).

Mmmmhh! - went there, seen that ;>)

Regards
Roberto


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html