[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] Proposal: WWW / slashdot
> On 28-Feb-2000 Per Koelle wrote:
> > This is silly. There ARE 2 kinds of membership:
> > One for the At Large, and one for the DNSO GA !!!
> > If we dont have this separation the at-large will be able to vote
> > NINE members in the Board and CONTROLE the DNSO NC and therefore also
> > be able have their voice heard this way.
> You are wrong. The DNSO GA does not control or elect the DNSO NC.
> Unfortunately IMHO.
> Your criticism is without merit.
given that the GA is the union of the dnso constituency members plus other
direct GA members one can say that the GA indirectly "elected" the dnso NC?
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html