[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] Proposal: WWW / slashdot
Nii and all assembly members,
Actually no Nii one cannot say this as the election was fradulent.
Dr. Nii Quaynor wrote:
> > On 28-Feb-2000 Per Koelle wrote:
> > > This is silly. There ARE 2 kinds of membership:
> > > One for the At Large, and one for the DNSO GA !!!
> > > If we dont have this separation the at-large will be able to vote
> > > NINE members in the Board and CONTROLE the DNSO NC and therefore also
> > > be able have their voice heard this way.
> > You are wrong. The DNSO GA does not control or elect the DNSO NC.
> > Unfortunately IMHO.
> > Your criticism is without merit.
> given that the GA is the union of the dnso constituency members plus other
> direct GA members one can say that the GA indirectly "elected" the dnso NC?
> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html