[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ga] Re: Harald - it's time to dance

Jeff, Jean-Michel  and all,

  I, and our members are in agreement with you here Jeff.  Thank you
for speaking out here.  

David "Dude" Jenson
INEGRoup-East Director

In a message dated 1/27/00 3:59:57 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com writes:

<< Jean-Michel and all,
   You may support Haralds proposal, but there is NO mandate for it.
 Hence it would be invalid and fraudulent to implement it without a
 vote of the Assembly Members.  That has not been done to date.
 Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
 > FInnaly I got the time to read all emails from list.
 > And I have to say yes it's time to dance and I fully support the text of
 > Harald for the mailing lists rules.
 > Hope now to discuss more relevant matters to the DNS and ICANN.
 > Jean-Michel
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Roberto Gaetano [mailto:roberto.gaetano@voila.fr]
 > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 8:09 PM
 > To: Harald@Alvestrand.no
 > Cc: baptista@pccf.net; ga@dnso.org
 > Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Harald - it's time to dance
 > Harald wrote:
 > >On Jan 25, Roberto said:
 > >"We will adopt the rules for a three-months period."
 > >I read this as meaning that the rules are in effect from Jan 25 until
 > April
 > >25. However, they are not *enforced*, since no SAA has been appointed
 > yet.
 > >
 > My guess would be that the tasks assigned to the SAAs will have to wait
 > until we have them onboard, but there's no reason to delay the rest.
 > In fact, the max msg size is already enforced.
 > >
 > >The rules do not mention the word "motion".
 > >If you wish to communicate with the SAAs, I recommend waiting until
 > they
 > >are appointed.
 > ;>)
 > But if the question is about where to address a motion, my best guess is
 >  "to the list" (under the assumption that it refers to matter that is
 > relevant to the DNS - if this is not the case, the motion will be out of
 >  order anyhow).
 > >
 > >>I also suggest you post to the dnso.org web site a legal address for
 > the
 > >>purpose of notices and correspondence to the dnso.
 > >
 > >A legal address of what?
 > >The DNSO, the GA or me personally?
 > >
 > I assume the request to be about the legal address of the DNSO, but
 > there's no such a thing, because the DNSO does not have an autonomous
 > legal existence.
 > About one year ago, when we were discussing about ICANN strructure and
 > the SOs, it was decided that the SOs were not going to be incorporated
 > separately, but that they would stay under the umbrella of ICANN.
 > Therefore, any legal request has to be addressed to ICANN. Joe Sims, I
 > assume.
 > Regards
 > Roberto
 Jeffrey A. Williams
 Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
 CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
 Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
 Contact Number:  972-447-1894
 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208