[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] Re: Harald - it's time to dance
Jeff, Jean-Michel and all,
I, and our members are in agreement with you here Jeff. Thank you
for speaking out here.
David "Dude" Jenson
In a message dated 1/27/00 3:59:57 PM Pacific Standard Time,
<< Jean-Michel and all,
You may support Haralds proposal, but there is NO mandate for it.
Hence it would be invalid and fraudulent to implement it without a
vote of the Assembly Members. That has not been done to date.
Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
> FInnaly I got the time to read all emails from list.
> And I have to say yes it's time to dance and I fully support the text of
> Harald for the mailing lists rules.
> Hope now to discuss more relevant matters to the DNS and ICANN.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roberto Gaetano [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 8:09 PM
> To: Harald@Alvestrand.no
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Harald - it's time to dance
> Harald wrote:
> >On Jan 25, Roberto said:
> >"We will adopt the rules for a three-months period."
> >I read this as meaning that the rules are in effect from Jan 25 until
> >25. However, they are not *enforced*, since no SAA has been appointed
> My guess would be that the tasks assigned to the SAAs will have to wait
> until we have them onboard, but there's no reason to delay the rest.
> In fact, the max msg size is already enforced.
> >The rules do not mention the word "motion".
> >If you wish to communicate with the SAAs, I recommend waiting until
> >are appointed.
> But if the question is about where to address a motion, my best guess is
> "to the list" (under the assumption that it refers to matter that is
> relevant to the DNS - if this is not the case, the motion will be out of
> order anyhow).
> >>I also suggest you post to the dnso.org web site a legal address for
> >>purpose of notices and correspondence to the dnso.
> >A legal address of what?
> >The DNSO, the GA or me personally?
> I assume the request to be about the legal address of the DNSO, but
> there's no such a thing, because the DNSO does not have an autonomous
> legal existence.
> About one year ago, when we were discussing about ICANN strructure and
> the SOs, it was decided that the SOs were not going to be incorporated
> separately, but that they would stay under the umbrella of ICANN.
> Therefore, any legal request has to be addressed to ICANN. Joe Sims, I
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208