RE: [ga] Re: What list forwards to what list

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

I am seeing those of us who post spending our time arguing about what "our"
individual point of view is about a subject. Is that the purpose of ga?  I
don't think it is, and I am looking forward to seeing a path to
communication which might be like a conversation where individuals respect
the speaker, even if they don't agree with the viewpoint.  That might enable
some of us to better understand each other -- even if not everyone... 

That might be progress of some kind.


-----Original Message-----
From: William X. Walsh [mailto:william@dso.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 9:35 PM
To: david@aminal.com
Cc: ga@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [ga] Re: What list forwards to what list


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 28-Jan-2000 david@aminal.com wrote:
> Communication via email is DIFFERENT. Profoundly different. A disruptive
> email
> does not create a physical barrier to other communications, it is
trivially
> easy to physically ignore an email. You can communicate just as if it
didn't
> exist at all.

It most certainly does create a barrier.  Not a physical one, but no less
strong a barrier anyway.

> I find it astounding.

As do I, that people have such a problem with rules that simply require them
to
act with common civility.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@dso.net>
DSo Networks  http://dso.net/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://dso.net/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: DSo Networks

iD8DBQE4kQBX8zLmV94Pz+IRAuAcAJ0ZLO0dISR9cSLBbS8614aiXfPdiQCeM74J
zU9Q//LqX4shxSd2t/96ixM=
=JOce
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----