Re: [ga] Result of the poll

[Dnsipv6@aol.com]

Jeff and everyone else,

  Indeed Jeff at least these organizations should be included on an
individual member basis.  I would add that ALL Stakeholders, as
you have pointed out many time in the past should be freely able
to participate and vote.  Anything less is purposefully disenfranchising.

David "Dude" Jenson
INEGRoup-East Director

In a message dated 1/24/00 11:30:26 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com writes:

<< Roberto and all,
 
 Roberto Gaetano wrote:
 
 > Joe Baptista wrote:
 > >
 > >Always a pleasure - if not a joy.  Now - when are we going to have a
 > real
 > >vote - with real options?
 > >
 >
 > All what we need is agreement on the following:
 > - clear definition of the voting body, with identification of the voting
 >  individuals;
 
   Yes, but most of these you already know as they are participants
 on the DNSO GA list or the DNSO Announce list.  It might be a
 good idea to open it up to those on the IETF, NONOCM, IDNO
 and the Domain Policy lists as well.
 
 >
 > - clear definition of the voting procedure;
 
   Indeed.  And a clear adherence to that procedure as well.
 One might also want a neutral third party to oversee this voting
 such as the Federal Election Commission. HTTP://www.fec.gov
 
 >
 > - clear definition of the question upon which to vote.
 
   Also agreed.  If it is a resolution or resolutions, hopefully
 this would be plural in all cases of Resolutions/Questions
 that are being decided it should be by simple majority and
 all votes should be tallied online with secret ballot.
 
 >
 >
 > Regards
 > Roberto
 
 Regards,
 
 --
 Jeffrey A. Williams
 Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
 CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
 Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
 Contact Number:  972-447-1894
 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
 
  >>