Re: Example of order (Re: [ga] Blockage/delay of postings)

[Joe Baptista <baptista@pccf.net>]

On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> >As Jeff Williams pointed out earlier - that's nonsence.  The filtering
> >criteria is a group of people in the shadows and I'm waiting for the rest
> >of your report to me.
> 
> You have my report.

You know what I expect - full disclosure - as promised.

> >   So can we get on with it and spend less time trying
> >to justify the mistakes of the pirates who run icann and the dnso.  Don't
> >drop the ball harald.
> 
> Note: Under Robert's rules of order, the use of the word "pirates", being a 
> characterization of a person or group of persons, and not of an action on 
> the floor or a consequence thereof, is not within decorum.
> 
> It is therefore within the rules to ask you to apologize for using it in 
> this debate, if you claim to be willing to follow Robert's Rules of Order.
> If you don't apologize, a motion to have you censured, punished or expelled 
> would be in order in a parliamentary body following Robert's Rules of Order.
> 
> Do we have your apology?

One can't appologize until the rules are in place, can one?

Now - Harald - if I don't get further disclosure - there's going to be
some more ass kicking.

Regards
Joe Baptista