[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [ga] Unfair?




Harald, I didn't intend to cut out any other country's or society's
perspective, or disregard it by my reference. I was responding to something
specific and so chose to reference the U.S. Constitution as a point of
reference. I think it's okay for us all to accept each other still as being
"nationals", isn't it, even when the medium we are referencing is global?

Sorry if I offended you personally. Not my intent.

Have a good holiday season. 

Best regards, Marilyn
-----Original Message-----
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:Harald@Alvestrand.no]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 4:19 AM
To: Mark C. Langston; Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Cc: 'Michael Sondow'; Randy Canis; ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] Unfair? 


At 19:42 16.12.99 -0800, Mark C. Langston wrote:

>On 16 December 1999, "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com> wrote:
>
>
> >Michael,
> >sigh,) I'll face days or weeks of postings about how devious and
underhanded
> >I am as a representative of a large corporation, but I will try this
anyway.
> >
> >Gathering up the interests of users is a challenge. And yes, individuals
are
> >extremely important, but the good of society sometimes overrides... that
is
> >the genesis of the U.S. constitution, isn't' it?
>
>
>The "society" the Constitution is written for was formed by individuals who
>were sick of exactly this type of (non)representation.
please cut the americanisms.

When your forefathers fled the persecution in Europe, my forefathers stayed 
home and did something about it; both facts say nothing about the 
forefathers of our Asian participants (if any are left), and all of the 
above is irrelevant to the discussion at hand, dealing with the *global* 
Internet.

End of rant.

                      Harald A

--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no