[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ga] Re: Revised Agenda proposal
Santiago General Assembly Meeting Chair(Nii) and all,
i have a compromise proposal.
hold general assembly as scheduled with the following modification;
13:30 - 14:30 Working Group Meetings
(may do over lunch or on Monday as appropriate.)
14:30 - 17:30 General Assembly
in future(November Meeting,...), we should allocate Monday for WG meetings.
chon
PS: we plan to hold Committee E Meeting(Awareness and Outreach) over lunch
on Tuesday(and more later if necessary).
*****************************************************************************
> Dear General Assembly Members,
>
> I would like to propose an slightly revised outline agenda for the
> Santiago DNSO General Assembly meeting. (My thanks to Jean-Michel for
> kicking this discussion off).
>
> Please note that I believe that at least a full day is requried for the
> DNSO GA (and therefore the DNSO Constituency meetings should be held
> the previous day (the Monday)), as (in my opinion) anything less than
> a day makes a mockery of the attempt at a General Assembly.
>
> What I propose below is an outline - if there is any positive feedback
> to this I will provide a more detailed agenda for discussion.
>
> I look forward to your comments.
>
> Dennis
>
> P.S. Please feel free to broadcast this e-mail message widely as the
> DNSO GA list has barely two hundred members and is therefore quite
> unrepresentative at this time.
> -------------
> Agenda for DNSO General Assembly
>
>
> 09:00 Appointment of Chairman
> (Objective – a neutral chairman for the day)
>
> 09:15 Report from the ICANN Board
> (Objective – an update on the ICANN Board’s Requests to the DNSO)
>
> 09:30 Report from the Interim Names Council
> (Objective – a progress report on the proposals for the administration
> of the DNSO)
>
> 10:00 Report from the DNSO Constituency Meetings
> (Objective – to provide the General Assembly with a understanding of
> each DNSO Constituency, its membership, its priority issues, etc. To
> provide a report on the Constituency elections to the Names Council
> (electorate, voting procedures, etc.))
>
> 10:45 Coffee
>
> 11:15 Review of Working Groups
> Working Groups established by the Interim Names Council
> Working Groups proposed at public informal meeting held after Berlin
> DNSO General Assembly
> (Objective – to scope the current work of the DNSO and to establish who
> is already involved and working on the issues identified. To identify
> current working group leaders and members.)
>
> 12:30 Lunch
>
> 13:30 Break-out Sessions for Working Groups
> (Objective – Identification of consensus to date and outstanding work
> items. To identify relevant background documentation, etc.)
>
> 15:30 Reports from the Working Group Sessions
> (Objective – Brief status reports to General Assembly with pointers to
> further information for interested individuals).
>
> 16:30 Open Forum Discussion
> (Objective – to catch anything otherwise being missed)
>
> 17:30 Close
>
> ---------------
> Date sent: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 12:11:31 +0200
> From: Jean-Michel Becar <Jean-Michel.Becar@etsi.fr>
> Subject: [ga] Agenda proposal
> To: ga@dnso.org
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > As I can see the discussion is not really constructive at that time.
> So
> > let's try to make things happen instead of trying to go back to the
> old
> > situation, Do you remember? So now let's go to work.
> >
> > This is my proposal for the agenda of the DNSO GA in Santiago :
> >
> > 1- Constituencies updates
> > A) each constituencies could make a 10 minutes speech
> > B) Public comments on constituencies
> >
> > 2- Chairman's Working Groups updates
> > A) DG F
> > B) WG A
> > C) WG B
> > D) WG C
> > E) WG D
> > F) WG E
> > G) Public comments on working groups
> >
> > 3- Elections of the NC
> > When could be done? and how?
> >
> > On that point I think that if the GA decide if we can go for the
> elections
> > at least for the recognized constituencies : ccTLD, Commercial
> and
> > Business entities, Registrars, Intellectual Property, ISP, they can
> process
> > during the Santiago and thus start to have a partial elected NC,
> which I
> > think it's better than a provisional NC.
> > The gTLD and the non Commercial must try to make their best effort to
> come
> > up with a solution to be recognized during this meeting. The gTLD
> must
> > accept the fact to have only one representative and the non Comm must
> find a
> > way to exist.
> >
> > 4- Non commercial constituencie update
> >
> > 5- Plan for the next months and future
> > According to John C. Lewis inputs:
> > A) DNSO Funding
> > B) Business plan & Financial report
> > C) Reltaionship of DNSO finances to the ICANN Board and operations
> > D) Actions to be taken for the next months
> > -- Nomination for the Borad : but we must wait for all
> constituencies
> > NC representative.
> > E) Preparation of the LA meeting
> >
> > 6- Public general comments
> >
> > 7- Buffet or drink ---- Very important item
> >
> > Jean-Michel Bécar
> > becar@etsi.fr
> > http://www.etsi.org
> > E.T.S.I. Project Manager
> > Tel: +(33) (0)4 92 94 43 15
> > Fax: +(33) (0)4 92 38 52 15
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------- Dennis M.
> Jennings Director, Computing Services, University College Dublin.
> Address: Daedalus Building, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland E-mail:
> Dennis.Jennings@ucd.ie Telephone: +353-(1) 706 7817 Fax:
>