Re: [ga-udrp] Background Documents

["NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

Exactly. And no there is no strong opposing force. That is why the GA has
one vote and all those who wish it to remain and remain the way it is have
all the rest. The task force says it will try to reach a consensus. But look
at the members of the Task Force. Is this a Task Force designed for
Consensus? It says if no consensus can be reached it will come down to a
vote. Again look at who is represented on the task force. The vote is
predetermined.

All I see one can do there is to get comments on the record that the GA
wants to put on the record.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Dierker" <eric@hi-tek.com>
To: <DannyYounger@cs.com>
Cc: <ga-udrp@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [ga-udrp] Background Documents


> I have done a reasonable amount of research on this, and I feel like I
must be
> missing something.  It appears to me that the UDRP and the below cited act
are
> only really supported by IPOs (no not public offerings but Intellectual
Property
> lobbying groups).  I find little to no competing and well organized
opposing
> interests.  Yes some good intellectuals and good lawyers like Mr. Lovell
but no
> actual force opposing the lobbyists.
>
> Can one of you fine people give me a good argument for the UDRP that is
not
> strictly for the benefit of the IP constituency.  I for one like existing
laws
> and would like to see them enforced and if an UDRP did this I would be all
for
> it, otherwise it looks like a mechanism for circumvention of Sovereign and
> legitmate laws.
>
> Sincerely,
> Eric
>
> DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>
> > S 1255 IS, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.
> > Re: criminalization of the unauthorized use of trademarked names in
Internet
> > domain names.
> > Sponsor: Sen. Spencer Abraham (R-MI).
> > Date Introduced: June 21, 1999.
> > http://www.techlawjournal.com/cong106/cybersquat/s1255is.htm
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-udrp@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-udrp" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-udrp@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-udrp" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-udrp@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-udrp" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html