Re: [ga-sys] The EU Privacy issue
Friday, May 25, 2001, 3:50:02 AM, NameCritic wrote:
> Amazing how all things that disagree with your posts are devoid of facts.
> You stated the DNSO does not exist legally. Define away William. Because I
> like where this is going. If they do not exist legally then the
> Constituencie that now exist within the DNSO have no power to vote on
> anything and also exist illegally. That poses a very interesting argument. I
> wish to hear more. The vague references you give as responses to everyone
> here are simply not enough William.
Because something does not exist as a legal entity does not lead to
this wild flights of fancy you are insisting on continuing with.
> Agreeing to arbitration makes the UDRP a law in effect.
No, it doesn't. But like I said in my post, this is irrelevant. The
FACT is that one CAN protect your trademark under the law EVEN WITHOUT
having to register a domain name, or hold that domain name.
Do you dispute that?
Because that was the point that was being discussed. Wild flights of
fancy getting off topic and bringing in irrelevant arguments will not
distract us from that point, which I was addressing to Joanna's
William X Walsh
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-sys" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html