Re: [ga-rules] Please vote so we may find consensus or not!

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Patrick,

that is not a catch-22 it is a conundrum.  We need no formal vote for a
consensus and since this is a rule matter we can reach it here.

Please respond to me personally with a;

Yes - all sub list post should appear on the ga-full

or

No - I do not want sub list posts to appear on the ga-full.


Consensus is really easy to reach on such an easy item, Just Do It and mine will
be better than hers!

I will close in three days and then we will know the consensus of those who
participate and care about rules, Stay on threader so I can store and validate.

Sincerely,
Eric

ps and no I am not chair of rules Bill Lovell is!

Patrick Corliss wrote:

>
> I am strongly in favour of your suggestion that all mail should appear on
> [ga-full].  This is a simple matter to arrange.  All we need to do is
> subscribe {ga-full] to all of the sublists.  It would create a set of
> *virtual* constituencies which I suggested when I stood for election as
> Alternate Chair.
>
> What you don't appreciate is how hard such a thing is to arrange.  It is a
> Catch-22 situation.  The DNSO Secretariat will not accept any request for
> changes without GA consensus and we cannot get consensus with so many people
> deliberately wrecking the system.
>
> > Pease, enjoy now. You are at the proper place. Still 5 posts today to go!
> > Jefsey
>
> Best regards
> Patrick Corliss
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html