Re: [ga-rules] Re: Definition of Motions & Procedures

["William S. Lovell" <wsl@cerebalaw.com>]

Harald:

Put together what Joanna and I have been doing and I believe you
have precisely what you say below. A flow chart (can't do one in
.txt) would demonstrate the steps.

Bill Lovell

Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> --On onsdag, juni 27, 2001 08:26:41 -0700 "William S. Lovell"
> <wsl@cerebalaw.com> wrote:
>
> > I would suggest that this suggestion would be ineffective to do
> > anything except continue the "chat room" syndrome. Endless
> > "votes" on endless motions do not constitute decision making,
> > but only playing around.
>
> My point exactly; we need a process that can somehow be forced to converge
> in finite time, yet not be easily manipulable by people who understand the
> rules to produce outcomes that the majority do not want.
>
> I do not know if this is possible; I know that I don't know of a current
> system that works.
>
>                        Harald

--
Any terms or acronyms above that are not familiar
to the reader may possibly be explained at:
"WHAT IS": http://whatis.techtarget.com/
GLOSSARY: http://www.icann.org/general/glossary.htm


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html