Re: [ga-roots] Microsoft case shows how ICANN breaches USA antitrust laws

[Sandy Harris <sandy@storm.ca>]

Len Lindon wrote:

> In August the Supreme Court of Uruguay at Montevideo will be
> asked to conclude that:
> "ICANN's exclusive contracts with Internet Address Providers
> are exclusionary devices, in violation of the USA Sherman Act."

This appears nonsensical. Why should a Uruguayan court be asked
to rule on an alleged violation of US law, apparently by an
Australian?

> In early September antitrust proceedings will be commenced
> in California at the nearest relevant court to Marina del Rey
> asking the court to confirm that:
> "ICANN's exclusive contracts with Internet Address Providers
> are exclusionary devices, in violation of the USA Sherman Act."

Let us know how that goes.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html