ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-roots]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Re[4]: [ga-roots] Re[4]: [ga-icann] interesting California law to consider


There is nothing wrong with outsourcing DNS services.  New.net 
outsources to UDNS.  If the TLD is managed properly, DNS 
services are just part of that management.

That does not mean, however, that some of what you claim, 
William, is not the case.  I would just hesitate to make a blanket 
statement like that.  I also believe that the days of "please load 
these TLDs" has come to an end.  TLD managers are going to 
have to pay for DNS services, including possibly excessive 
bandwidth on the TLD servers.  That is as it should be.  If you want 
to be a TLD holder, you will have to be prepared to manage it.

Leah


On 17 Jun 2001, at 11:03, William X. Walsh wrote:

> Hello Marc,
> 
> Sunday, June 17, 2001, 10:44:10 AM, Marc Schneiders wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, at 10:10 [=GMT-0700], William X. Walsh wrote:
> 
> >> > Some weeks ago, I had a look at most of their websites, and found, that the 
> >> > majority of them have some more or less stringent requirements concerning 
> >> > which TLD they would include in their root.
> >> > You know obviously more than their websites say.
> >> 
> >> References please?
> >> 
> >> There are no minimum standards or technical requirements at any of the
> >> alt.roots that I am aware of.  If you know otherwise, please don't
> >> just say it, point to the references.
> >> 
> >> That means that unless someone else, who also didn't meet any minimum
> >> standards, emailed them that they wanted that string first, you can
> >> have it, even if you don't know the difference between an MX record
> >> and a CNAME record, much less how to setup a controlled managed dns
> >> system for the domain.
> 
> > This is utter %$#@^& and you know it. You will not get your TLD
> > included in the ORSC root if there aren't at least two nameservers
> > correctly answering for it.
> 
> No, my comments are spot on.  The vast majority of those TLDs use the
> SAME nameservers.  The actual claimant asks Sexton or one of the
> other few who DO actually know how to manage DNS to add an SOA record
> in their dns servers for them.
> 
> The TINC rules are mostly cosmetic.  They are in no way real minimum
> technical standards.
> 
> I can point to a large number of TLDs in the ORSC zone that were
> "Created" by someone posting to the list asking if someone can add
> their TLD to their dns for them.
> 
> You know it, and I know it, so can the BS Marc.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 


~ Leah G ~
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>