[ga-roots] A "Unique" Authoritative.....ADDRESS SPACE ?

["JIM FLEMING" <JimFleming@prodigy.net>]

ICANN is structured:
1/3 Protocol
1/3 Address
1/3 Names

Claims are made about "Unique" Name Spaces, etc.
http://www.icann.org/stockholm/unique-root-draft.htm
Discussion Draft: A Unique, Authoritative Root for the DNS
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2826.txt
IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root


Will claims also be made about the need for the world
to use a "Unique Authoritative Address Space" ?


The 32-bit legacy IPv4 .ARPA Address space is tiny...
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
0:0  ARPA

The IPv6 128-bit Address Space is huge (and not manageable or efficiently
routable)
...a common prefix is 3FFE:


The IPv8 64-bit Address Space is "Unique"
...it is routable with the 2002:<IPv4>:0000 IPv8-style Prefix

The IPv16 64-bit Address Space is also "Unique" but separate...
...for performance, security, privacy, etc.


Will claims also be made about the need for the world
to use a "Unique Authoritative Address Space" ?


Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html