ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-roots]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga-roots] MOTION - Consensus-Based Policy on Alt Roots




On 9 May 2001, at 13:28, Patrick Corliss wrote:


> 
> > Tuesday, May 08, 2001, 8:10:52 PM, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> 
> > > As the role of the DNSO General Assembly is to provide consensus-based
> > > policy input to ICANN, I have asked everybody that they think that
> > > consensus-based policy should be?  I therefore move the following
> > > policy should be adopted by ICANN:
> >
> > > "ICANN adopts compliance with the relevant DNS standards as a general
> > > principle.  It recognises that there is a likelihood of collision
> > > and/or confusion when root operators do not comply with RFC 1591 which
> > > suggests that there should be a "unique root zone*.  ICANN will
> > > therefore adopt methods and measures to foster co-operation and
> > > compliance within the industry."
> >
> > > Any seconders?
> 

I would suggest some re-wording of this motion, but in principle I will 
second it.  Then I will suggest an amendment.
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>