Re: [ga-roots] Capture and Diversion
At 02:35 PM 5/2/01 -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
>Wednesday, May 02, 2001, 11:05:32 AM, Simon Higgs wrote:
> > At 02:55 AM 5/3/01 +1000, you wrote:
> >>On Wednesday, May 02, 2001 10:31 AM (AEST), Kristy McKee wrote:
> >> > IMHO this is beyond ICANN's scope as Bret mentioned ealier: the IETF is
> >> > the place for decisions like these to happen; therefore if we do have an
> >> > opinion I recommend we direct it in their direction.
> >>That's an interesting observation, thank you. If we assume that it is
> >>ICANN's policy to comply with the technical standards as laid down by the
> >>IETF, then this will also apply to the question of a "unique root" as
> >>defined in the RFCs.
> > Then can we all assume ICANN will fully comply with this IETF document
> > it becomes an RFC:
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-higgs-root-defs-00.txt
>Don't you really mean "in the highly unlikely event that it becomes a
Stranger things have happened. Like RFC1149 actually working (
Never say never... ;-)
It's a feature not a bug...
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html