[ga-org] Outline of proposed consensus points
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:40:16 -0700, Eric Dierker wrote:
BOUNCE firstname.lastname@example.org: Non-member submission from
[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]
Milton Mueller wrote:
> "Use it or lose it" is an appropriate policy in the toll-free number
> context, because there is a severe shortage of numbers
> and the capacity of the numbering plan is quite limited.
> There is no need for it anywhere in DNS, which has, for all
> practical purposes, almost limitless numbers of unique strings.
You of course are correct in a technical sense. What I was referring to was
in the marketing and broad use sense. I am speaking in terms of
qualitativeness not quantitativeness. If the goal of managing dotORG is to
enhance its' attractiveness and therefor increase the value to
organizations who use it, then I believe you would do well to consider my
suggestion. If not then I apologize.
It is only fair to point out that I work for a multimedia marketing company,
so my opinion is clearly skewed.
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-org" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html