ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Throw-away PR - is that what you want?


Thomas, this is really over the top.   What is the point of these personal
attacks?  William asks, is the GA voting going to have PR value for those
seeking a rebid?  Any honest assessment to that question (on list, off list,
to your mother, take your pick)  would say:  well, if the vote supports a
rebid, yes of course it will.    If it goes against a rebid, of course it
won't.    How would you answer his question?  The same way I answered it or
differently?

Do people care what the GA does?   I would hope that people do care.  You
don't?    Am I missing something, or is this some zany exercise to ensure
that the GA doesn't discuss anything of any information value to anyone on
the planet?   Why did you campaign to be the Chair of this organization, if
no one was supposed to pay any attention to it?

  Jamie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
To: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:42 PM
Subject: [ga] Throw-away PR - is that what you want?


> On 2002-05-09 13:39:57 -0400, James Love wrote:
>
> >Is there a "PR value" in a statement from the GA?  I would hope
> >so.  That would mean that people actually care what the GA says.
> >How could this not be clear, both on and off list?  And how would
> >it be a bad thing if a GA statement was actually noticed by
> >people?
>
> What a wonderful world - Ralph Nader's Consumer Project on
> Technology (and its director, James Love) doing free PR for the
> DNSO's General Assembly.
>
> Bad enough, what I've seen so far points in the opposite direction:
> The Consumer Project on Technology's director trying to abuse the GA
> as a throw-away public relations tool.
>
> So, once again, the question to everyone involved with this: Do you
> want that?  Do you really think that a little PR booster for a
> campaign of CPTech is worth giving up on the GA?
>
> Think twice, and respond, please.  Your responses may quite well
> influence what's going to happen.
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler                          http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>