Re: [ga] Point of Order

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Ross,

This is total bunk.

The apriori and always paramount right and obligation of any assembly is the
right to disband or call for dissolution.

The DNSO is sanctioned to do their work by the DoC.  Asking them to take away
that sanction is not a right but an obligation if we view that we are being used
for improper purposes.

Excuse me Ross as my memory fades, what is your interest, I mean who do you work
for that has an interest in ICANN continuing?

Eric

"Ross Wm. Rader" wrote:

> > That is not correct.  William has not pointed out the specific ICANN
> > ByLaw stipulation that would be violated by Jamie's motion.  In point of
> > fact, there is no such stipulation, or ANY rules about what is
> > legitimate deliberative material for the GA in the *ICANN ByLaws*.  If
> > you, Mr Wader, wish to press the issue, then why don't you please
> > produce the relevant section of the ICANN ByLaws.  Otherwise, there is
> > no "point of order" as there are no established rules of order for the GA.
>
> The bylaws are very clear on a couple of key points
>
> a) that the purpose of the GA is to act as an open forum for participation
> in the work of the DNSO.
>
> b) that the purpose of the DNSO is to advise the board with respect to
> policy issues relating to the Domain Name System.
>
> The motion on the table has nothing to do with the work of the DNSO and in
> fact, directly impacts two other supporting organizations that are being
> conveniently ignored by proponents of the motion.
>
> Two other things are quite clear from these two clauses in the bylaws
>
> a) that the GA has no place in making recommendations that affect
> stakeholders that are not part of the DNSO and,
>
> b) that the GA has no place in tabling recommendations directly with the
> DOC.
>
> As such, I strongly believe that William's objection is entirely legitimate
> and requires that the Chair provide guidance concerning the scope of the
> motion as presently under discussion.
>
> To answer the specific question, the citation from the bylaws are
> specifically 4.VI-B.1.a and 4.VI-B.4.a...
>
> -rwr
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html