ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Point of Order


On Wed, 8 May 2002, at 05:59 [=GMT-0700], William X Walsh wrote:

> Discussion on the broader subject matter is not forbidden,

Thank you so much!

> but the
> DNSO GA itself cannot take actions which exceed its charter granted
> mandate, and the chair must be limited in his actions by the charter
> as well.

Supposing you are right, which body could pass such a motion as that
proposed by James Love, both in the present structure of ICANN as well as
that suggested in the CEO's plan for reform?

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>