Re: [ga] Re: Timetable and proceedure for vote

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Thomas and all assembly members,

  The Tally thus fare Thomas is 17 in favor of a vote on Jamies
motion, 5 against and 1 undecided...  The list of these are in the
archives and some of them were posted on Monday by Joanna
Lane.  I believe that such verification work is the job of
the secretariat not Jamie or any other GA member, but
each member should keep their own Tally or follow
such motions supporters themselves...  I think this
would include you Thomas...

Thomas Roessler wrote:

> On 2002-05-08 04:25:49 -0400, James Love wrote:
>
> >"The GA asks the the US Department of Commerce to have an open
> >competition for the services now provided by ICANN, provided that
> >the new competition would address the need to develop an
> >international framework for DNS management.  The rationale for
> >asking for a rebid is that ICANN has dramatically changed the
> >intitial terms of refence for ICANN, and is proposing even further
> >changes, which have met extensive opposition in the Internet
> >community. The rebid would allow the DoC to consider both the
> >ICANN board proposal for restructuring, and alternatives offered
> >by others for managing key Internet resources."
>
> >As I understand your missives, and forgive me if I don't fully
> >appreciate what is going on here, you have accepted that this can
> >be voted on, but would also welcome either that I withdraw (no
> >thank you) or modify this further, or if others would offer
> >alternatives that are "less radical," as you put it.  I have yet
> >to see any support for specific "less radical" ballot proposals,
> >but wait to see what happens.
>
> Please also submit a list of ten supporters (as suggested in my
> original timeline posting, to which you agreed).  I suppose this is
> a purely formal question in this case, but let's get the record
> straight.  To abbreviate the procedure, I'd suggest that you produce
> that list from previous discussions, post it, and let those who are
> on it object if they want to.
>
> >PS, the discussion of this issue on your web log is certainly a
> >rather abbreviated summary of the debate.
>
> I don't even claim it's a summary.
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler                          http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html