ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] GA rules?


Actual acts of wrong must take a higher position of condemnation than words
that may be considered wrong.
In fact that is the basis of freedom for Mexico, USA and Canada.

We are not talking sticks and stones but words.  These are matters of debate
and not censorship.

Eric

William X Walsh wrote:

> Friday, Friday, March 29, 2002, 7:04:21 PM, Joanna Lane wrote:
>
> > I concur. If we want to attract and keep quality people on this list, we
> > must raise standards above this kind of mindless nonsense.
>
> How nice that you criticize me, Joanna, but don't criticize Joop for
> his posts, which were clear, if couched, attacks.
>
> Joop is the one who brought this subject up, and Joop is the one who
> posted doctored webpage links to make it look like something else
> entirely happened.  And if someone had done that to you, you'd respond
> angrily as well.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
> --
> Save Internet Radio!
> CARP will kill Webcasting!
> http://www.saveinternetradio.org/
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>