ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Why not let the market decide that as well?....



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Patrick Greenwell" <patrick@stealthgeeks.net>
of the DNS.
> >
> > ICANN should stay completely out of deciding any meanings or
> > restrictions on TLDs at all.  The standards for creating a restricted
> > TLD should be EXTREMELY high, with a major justification for why those
> > entities should be segregated, and why the string is the appropriate
> > on to segregate them with.
> 
> Why not let the market decide that as well?
> 

http://www.cybertelecom.org/enum.htm
"The Report recommends that ENUM be administered through a
single unified database also known as a golden tree, that this unified
database be located at the e164.arpa domain, that the ITU facilitate the
administration of this database, and that the US work rapidly to implement
ENUM."

http://www.New.Net
e164.shop
e164.agent
e164.arts
e164.auction
e164.chat
e164.church
e164.club
e164.family
e164.free
e164.game
e164.gmbh
e164.golf
e164.hola
e164.law
e164.llc
e164.llp
e164.love   
e164.med
e164.mp3
e164.school
e164.scifi
e164.soc
e164.sport
e164.travel
e164.video
e164.xxx

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12574.html
RFC-2001-07-01-000 IPv8 Expansion of Proof of Concept TLD Development

Jim Fleming
http://www.DOT.Arizona

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>