RE: [ga] Agenda Item -- Budget

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Wait a holdit! Registrars may accreditation fees, suffer the certification
audits, and still can't display the certification logo without paying yet
another fee?!?!

IMHO, this is more than highly irregular.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Gardner [mailto:andy@navigator.co.nz]
> Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 10:04 PM
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] Agenda Item -- Budget
> 
> 
> At 12:52 am -0400 5/6/01, babybows.com wrote:
> >The registrar constituency has prepared an eighteen-page 
> report detailing
> >elements of the upcoming proposed 2000-2001 ICANN Budget.
> >
> >http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc01/doc00026.doc
> >
> >
> >As funding will be an agenda item in Stockholm, perhaps (to echo the
> >comments of Raul Echebarria on the ncdnhc list), this is the 
> right moment to
> >strongly propose that the DNSO's budget be included in 
> ICANN's budget.
> 
> Given that ICANN has recently demanded that Registrars remove 
> the ICANN
> logo from their sites until ICANN presents them with a 
> logo-licensing deal,
> I'd say this is the right moment.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Andrew P. Gardner
> barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform 
> about the UDRP?
> We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
> Get active: http://www.domain-owners.org http://www.tldlobby.com
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html