Re: [ga] I understand Sotiris - Thank you WXW

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Jefsey and all assembly members,

Jefsey Morfin wrote:

> Dear William S. Lovell,
> Since you seem to have some expertise in reading
> the mater, may I ask you in what you think tjis to be
> of any interest in managing the Internet?
>
> I have on my desk two proposals to develop projects
> concerning DNS services form more than 3 and 6
> millions of internet addresses. They are certainly
> affected by the matters we should discuss here in
> order to uncover consensuses ruling them.
>
> May be shoud we convey the interested Members
> to switch to an altenative DNSO/GA ML?

  This might be a good idea in light of recent proclamations
made by the Alt chair earlier today.

>
>
> I do understand Sotiris. But I think that it is great
> time to see that Sotiris, Jeff, WXW and me at least
> do agree on something. Dear Sotiris: hope in view!

  I too am glad that we are all in agreement as well.  I
however don't see it as that unusual.  >;)

>
>
> Jefsey
>
> On 00:09 06/05/01, William S. Lovell said:
>
> >"William X. Walsh" wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Patrick,
> > >
> > > Saturday, May 05, 2001, 12:33:46 PM, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> > >
> > > > The list monitors have unanimously agreed that persons who have had their
> > > > posting rights withdrawn should continue their suspension for the
> > remainder
> > > > of the term imposed by the former list monitor.  This continuing
> > suspension
> > > > will apply to all of the GA lists.
> > >
> > > Please justify this chance in policy. The initial policy, and only one
> > > posted prior to today, indicated that suspensions were list specific,
> > > and did not apply universally to all lists.
> > >
> > > Why the change in policy without public input?
> > >
> > > Or is this the type of "business as usual" "change things as we go"
> > > behavior we should expect from this activist GA administration?
> >
> >That's not what it says.  It says if a person was suspended on list a,
> >and another person on list b and so on, those suspensions (with
> >regard to ALL lists in which the event occurs), will continue through
> >a change in list monitor as to the particular list.  Nowhere does it say
> >that a given suspension is anything other than list specific, although
> >the wording could certainly have been made less ambiguous.
> >
> >Bill Lovell
> >
> >--
> >This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html