ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] vote appeal



> Yesterday I posted the following to this list and to Mr.Gaetano,
> 
>  http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-full/Arc07/msg00580.html
> I have received no response.
> Today I sent a private email requesting some type of response I got
> none.
> 
> I looked to see if there was an objection or appeal process, there is
> not one. There is absolutely no reference to 10 nominations being
> needed to run for chair. And I think Mr. Corliss had all 10 of his
> lined up when that was announced. hmm.
> 
> I then looked at the rules and found this:
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2001.GA-chair-election-rules-v0.2.html
> SELECTION OF THE ALTERNATE CHAIR
> 
> The same process as for chair is used, but the candidate selected for
> chair is eliminated before the counting starts.
> 
> (NOTE: This is likely to be a different candidate than the runner-up
> in the selection procedure for chair, for instance when 90% of the
> electorate rank one person first and another second, while the
> remaining 10% vote for a third. Re-running the process is considered
> more likely to select a team that can work well together.)
> 
> This shows that there was no need to change any rules, the process
> itself would handle JW's withdrawal. And that we are supposed to have
> a whole other subsequent election for Alternate Chair
> 
>  Then I looked at the watchdog list and found this;
>  http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-watchdog/Arc00/
> 
> Which shows the committe knew that they would change the outcome of
> the election if they changed the rules, allowing for revoting.
> 
> This is disgusting.  I can understand why these people do not want me
> as alternate, but why did they do so much to get Mr. Corliss?  Could
> it be his association with a competitor to ICANN.

What competitor to ICANN?  Are you referring to the TLDA?  A trade 
association is not a competitor to ICANN and its membership would 
be open to ICANN as representative of the DoC, since DoC is a TLD 
holder.

AuDA?  Is a ccTLD a competitor?

His private business consulting business?  I don't think so.

I don't see where there was any more involved with Mr. Corliss' 
campaigning than yours, Eric.  I did not see anything on the list to 
indicate that there was anything amiss with the election.  As a 
matter of fact, considering the circumstances, I think it went 
extremely well.  Everyone had the opportunity to vote correctly and 
the tally was handled properly.  If the election were to be held 
today, I believe the results would be the same.

Sincerely,

Leah Gallegos
> 
> The clock is ticking I cannot ignore this!
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>