RE: [ga] gTLD Constituency
> From: Kent Crispin [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 5:22 PM
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 06:47:44PM -0400, Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
> > incumbent); and  anyway, it could be worse -- after all,
> if the gTLD
> > constituency had more votes, the resulting structure would
> be even *more*
> > anticompetitive.
> Jeez. What an absolutely silly and ridiculous distortion. The gTLD
> constituency is __14%__ of the NC, for petes sake. By any
> measure that
> is a small minority, and it is just silly to claim that the
> behavior of
> such a small minority is going to make the "resulting structure"
What I find so silly and ridiculous is the degree of your response for what,
you claim, is such a trivial matter. Were it so trivial, why do you resist?
For the record, I happen to disagree with you.
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html