ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] ICANN benefits


Let us make sure your comment is correctly understood.  You are saying
that it
is a benefit that we give Trademark owners more rights, that they
deserve more
rights and that you are in favor of giving them more rights under the
UDRP.
    Please refrain from attacking me, as my questions could have been
posted by
anyone. But feel free to attack my comments.  And if you do not I will
accept
that as acquiescience of the truth of what I stated.

Sincerely,

Dave Crocker wrote:

> >At 03:34 PM 4/6/2001, Kristy McKee wrote:
> >...
> >>At 03:13 PM 4/6/2001 -0700, Jeff Williams wrote:
> >>>1.) Domain Names have been relegated or equated directly to Trademarks.
> >
> >THis pre-dates ICANN.  ICANN instituted the UDRP and that actually gives
> >trademark more power than they had under the horrible, earlier NSI policy.
>
> sigh.  sorry.  bad typing.
>
> LESS power than under the NSI policy.
>
> d/
>
> ----------
> Dave Crocker   <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
> Brandenburg InternetWorking   <http://www.brandenburg.com>
> tel: +1.408.246.8253;   fax: +1.408.273.6464
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>