Re: [ga] serious participation in ICANN processes
Tuesday, April 03, 2001, 3:17:22 PM, 'Kent Crispin' wrote:
> So, bottom line, ICANN does not have members (as defined by the
> CNPBCL), and it is under no legal obligation to have them. There
> really is no question about this.
Nice to see you give legal opinions, but I think this matter will be
more likely to be settled in a court room when At-Large members sue
the ICANN BoD.
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html