Re: [ga] serious participation in ICANN processes
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:01:53PM -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
> Hello 'Kent,
> Tuesday, April 03, 2001, 3:17:22 PM, 'Kent Crispin' wrote:
> > So, bottom line, ICANN does not have members (as defined by the
> > CNPBCL), and it is under no legal obligation to have them. There
> > really is no question about this.
> Nice to see you give legal opinions, but I think this matter will be
> more likely to be settled in a court room when At-Large members sue
> the ICANN BoD.
Don't hold your breath. :-)
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
email@example.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html