ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] serious participation in ICANN processes


On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:01:53PM -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
> Hello 'Kent,
> 
> Tuesday, April 03, 2001, 3:17:22 PM, 'Kent Crispin' wrote:
> > So, bottom line, ICANN does not have members (as defined by the
> > CNPBCL), and it is under no legal obligation to have them.  There 
> > really is no question about this.
> 
> Nice to see you give legal opinions, but I think this matter will be
> more likely to be settled in a court room when At-Large members sue
> the ICANN BoD.

Don't hold your breath.  :-)

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>